“Content is the king”… quali contenuti scegliere per promuovere lo studio legale

Foto di Bill Gates, tratta dal suo blog personale

“Content is the king”… quali contenuti scegliere per promuovere lo studio legale

“No company is to small to partecipite”. Del famoso articolo di Bill Gates, tutto il web ha trattenuto il titolo ” Content is the king”, che viene ripetuto come un mantra da tutti coloro che producono contenuti; anche quelli di scarso valore.
Invece io preferisco soffermarmi su un’altra frase contenuta nell’articolo: “No company is to small to partecipite”.
L’articolo venne scritto agli albori di Internet, a metà degli anni ’90, e per lo più Gates si soffermava sul futuro business model dei Media (anticipando in parte la crisi e il cambiamento necessitato).
Tuttavia possiamo leggerlo “in maniera interessata”, accogliendo alcuni suggerimenti e applicandoli alla comunicazione degli studi legali.
La prima affermazione è preziosissima: Internet da la possibilità a tutti di partecipare alla creazione di contenuti. No company is to small…Dunque, perché non dovrebbe esserlo uno studio legale? Essere on line o sui social è una opportunità per farsi conoscere, a patto che il proprio “contenuto sia di valore”.
E qui veniamo agli altri due suggerimenti che ci provengono da Bill Gates, per il quale il contenuto di valore ha due specifiche caratteristiche: è sempre aggiornato; permette alle persone di essere coinvolte.
Se decidete dunque di partecipare alla produzione di contenuti su internet (on line e social), cercate di farlo in maniera puntuale e aggiornata e chiedetevi se quello che avete da dire può essere di sicuro interesse per la platea a cui volete parlare.
Al proposito: un buon comunicatore è sopratutto un bravissimo ascoltatore.

Ecco il testo integrale del post di Bill Gates “Content is the king”

“Content is where I expect much of the real money will be made on the Internet, just as it was in broadcasting.
The television revolution that began half a century ago spawned a number of industries, including the manufacturing of TV sets, but the long-term winners were those who used the medium to deliver information and entertainment.

When it comes to an interactive network such as the Internet, the definition of “content” becomes very wide. For example, computer software is a form of content-an extremely important one, and the one that for Microsoft will remain by far the most important.

But the broad opportunities for most companies involve supplying information or entertainment. No company is too small to participate.

One of the exciting things about the Internet is that anyone with a PC and a modem can publish whatever content they can create. In a sense, the Internet is the multimedia equivalent of the photocopier. It allows material to be duplicated at low cost, no matter the size of the audience.

The Internet also allows information to be distributed worldwide at basically zero marginal cost to the publisher. Opportunities are remarkable, and many companies are laying plans to create content for the Internet.

For example, the television network NBC and Microsoft recently agreed to enter the interactive news business together. Our companies will jointly own a cable news network, MSNBC, and an interactive news service on the Internet. NBC will maintain editorial control over the joint venture.

I expect societies will see intense competition-and ample failure as well as success-in all categories of popular content-not just software and news, but also games, entertainment, sports programming, directories, classified advertising, and on-line communities devoted to major interests.

Printed magazines have readerships that share common interests. It’s easy to imagine these communities being served by electronic online editions.

But to be successful online, a magazine can’t just take what it has in print and move it to the electronic realm. There isn’t enough depth or interactivity in print content to overcome the drawbacks of the online medium.

If people are to be expected to put up with turning on a computer to read a screen, they must be rewarded with deep and extremely up-to-date information that they can explore at will. They need to have audio, and possibly video. They need an opportunity for personal involvement that goes far beyond that offered through the letters-to-the-editor pages of print magazines.

A question on many minds is how often the same company that serves an interest group in print will succeed in serving it online. Even the very future of certain printed magazines is called into question by the Internet.

For example, the Internet is already revolutionizing the exchange of specialized scientific information. Printed scientific journals tend to have small circulations, making them high-priced. University libraries are a big part of the market. It’s been an awkward, slow, expensive way to distribute information to a specialized audience, but there hasn’t been an alternative.

Now some researchers are beginning to use the Internet to publish scientific findings. The practice challenges the future of some venerable printed journals.

Over time, the breadth of information on the Internet will be enormous, which will make it compelling. Although the gold rush atmosphere today is primarily confined to the United States, I expect it to sweep the world as communications costs come down and a critical mass of localized content becomes available in different countries.

For the Internet to thrive, content providers must be paid for their work. The long-term prospects are good, but I expect a lot of disappointment in the short-term as content companies struggle to make money through advertising or subscriptions. It isn’t working yet, and it may not for some time.

So far, at least, most of the money and effort put into interactive publishing is little more than a labor of love, or an effort to help promote products sold in the non-electronic world. Often these efforts are based on the belief that over time someone will figure out how to get revenue.

In the long run, advertising is promising. An advantage of interactive advertising is that an initial message needs only to attract attention rather than convey much information. A user can click on the ad to get additional information-and an advertiser can measure whether people are doing so.

But today the amount of subscription revenue or advertising revenue realized on the Internet is near zero-maybe $20 million or $30 million in total. Advertisers are always a little reluctant about a new medium, and the Internet is certainly new and different.

Some reluctance on the part of advertisers may be justified, because many Internet users are less-than-thrilled about seeing advertising. One reason is that many advertisers use big images that take a long time to download across a telephone dial-up connection. A magazine ad takes up space too, but a reader can flip a printed page rapidly.

As connections to the Internet get faster, the annoyance of waiting for an advertisement to load will diminish and then disappear. But that’s a few years off.

Some content companies are experimenting with subscriptions, often with the lure of some free content. It’s tricky, though, because as soon as an electronic community charges a subscription, the number of people who visit the site drops dramatically, reducing the value proposition to advertisers.

A major reason paying for content doesn’t work very well yet is that it’s not practical to charge small amounts. The cost and hassle of electronic transactions makes it impractical to charge less than a fairly high subscription rate.

But within a year the mechanisms will be in place that allow content providers to charge just a cent or a few cents for information. If you decide to visit a page that costs a nickel, you won’t be writing a check or getting a bill in the mail for a nickel. You’ll just click on what you want, knowing you’ll be charged a nickel on an aggregated basis.

This technology will liberate publishers to charge small amounts of money, in the hope of attracting wide audiences.

Those who succeed will propel the Internet forward as a marketplace of ideas, experiences, and products-a marketplace of content.”

Related posts

Intervista a Josè Paulo Graciotti, autore del volume “La Governance strategica degli studi legali”

Qual è la migliore organizzazione di uno studio legale? La vostra specifica, basta che ci sia; con tanto di obiettivi da raggiungere, misurazione dei risultati raggiunti e procedure chiare. Il tema della organizzazione strategica degli studi professionali sta diventando un mantra: Ma tra il dire e il fare – come si usa dire – c’è

Read More

Il sito web dell’Avvocato: posizionamento su Google e regole SEO

“Ho un sito web bellissimo, ma non risulta il primo sulla Serp di Google quando digito studio legale diritto del…”. Oppure: “quando avrò il sito, troverò più clienti perché sarò primo in Serp, vero?” Dare per scontata la conoscenza da parte del cliente (in questo caso parliamo di avvocati) di come funzioni il web è

Read More
Tabella con le principali definizioni di web marketing utile peri gli avvocati

Web Marketing per Avvocati: tutto quello che è importante sapere

Comunicazione on line, web marketing, sponsorizzazioni, digital advertising disegnato su misura per gli avvocati: siete bombardati di offerte on line del tipo: “diventa unico nel tuo settore” ; “vincere a mani basse la concorrenza e arrivare primo nel mercato on line”; “costruire una pratica redditizia senza dover essere un brand”; “ottenere venti/trenta clienti al mese”.

Read More

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Iscriviti per rimanere aggiornato Nota: Non mandiamo spam